Election of Remedies in Nevada

The plaintiff in a lawsuit is allowed to seek as many remedies as are available to her and may choose the one which is most beneficial to her.  The doctrine of election of remedies requires:

  1. The existence of two or more remedies;
  2. Inconsistency between the remedies; and
  3. Choice of one or more of the remedies.[1]

A suit for damages is an alternative to a suit for rescission or restitution—a plaintiff may not avoid the contract and get placed in the position she found herself before the contract and receive a monetary damages award.  The defense that the plaintiff must choose between alternative remedies, must be asserted in the defendant’s answer, or it is waived.  NRCP 12.

[1] Second Baptist Church of Reno v. First Nat. Bank of Nevada, 89 Nev. 217, 510 P.2d 630 (1973).



The information provided on this site does not, and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You understand each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. You should not take or refrain from taking action based on any information contained on this website without first consulting legal counsel, as it is not intended to advise you on your particular matter. Further, you understand that no guarantee is given that the information contained herein is an accurate statement of the law at any given point in time, as the law is constantly changing. Guest bloggers are responsible for their own content, which is not to be construed as an article authored by NLB. Please see https://nevadalaw.info/disclaimer

Leave a comment