Nevada Jury Instructions: Assumption Of Risk


The defendant seeks to establish that the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury from the danger the plaintiff contends caused his injury.

In order to establish that the plaintiff assumed the risk, the defendant must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, the following elements:

  • That the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the risk;
  • That he fully appreciated the danger resulting from the risk; and
  • That he voluntarily exposed himself to the danger.

If you find that each of these elements has been proved, then the plaintiff may not recover for his injuries and your verdict should be for the defendant. If, on the other hand, you decide that any of these elements has not been proved, then the defendant has not proved the plaintiff assumed the risk.

NEV. J.I. 4.16



The information provided on this site does not, and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You understand each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. You should not take or refrain from taking action based on any information contained on this website without first consulting legal counsel, as it is not intended to advise you on your particular matter. Further, you understand that no guarantee is given that the information contained herein is an accurate statement of the law at any given point in time, as the law is constantly changing. Guest bloggers are responsible for their own content, which is not to be construed as an article authored by NLB. Please see

Leave a comment