Nevada Jury Instructions: Conclusive Presumption; Jury Question As To Existence Of Basic Facts
CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION; JURY QUESTION AS TO EXISTENCE OF BASIC FACTS
If you find by a preponderance of the evidence that (insert controverted basic facts), then you must also find that (insert presumed fact).
If you do not find by a preponderance of the evidence that (insert controverted basic facts), then you must find that (insert nonexistence of presumed fact).
NEV. J.I. 3.02
The information provided on this site does not, and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You understand each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. You should not take or refrain from taking action based on any information contained on this website without first consulting legal counsel, as it is not intended to advise you on your particular matter. Further, you understand that no guarantee is given that the information contained herein is an accurate statement of the law at any given point in time, as the law is constantly changing. Guest bloggers are responsible for their own content, which is not to be construed as an article authored by NLB. Please see https://nevadalaw.info/disclaimer
View all of NLB's posts.