Nevada Jury Instructions: Defective Product Assumption Of Risk


The defendant contends that the plaintiff assumed the risk of the harm that he suffered. To establish that the plaintiff assumed this risk, the defendant must show, by a preponderance of the evidence; that:

  • The plaintiff actually knew and appreciated the particular risk or danger created by the defect;
  • The plaintiff voluntarily encountered this risk while realizing the danger; and
  • The plaintiffs decision to voluntarily encounter the known risk was unreasonable.

A person who thus assumes the risk is not entitled to recover for damages which resulted from the danger to which he exposed himself.

NEV. J.I. 7.08



The information provided on this site does not, and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You understand each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. You should not take or refrain from taking action based on any information contained on this website without first consulting legal counsel, as it is not intended to advise you on your particular matter. Further, you understand that no guarantee is given that the information contained herein is an accurate statement of the law at any given point in time, as the law is constantly changing. Guest bloggers are responsible for their own content, which is not to be construed as an article authored by NLB. Please see

Leave a comment