In Nevada, the elements for a claim of fraudulent transfer are:
- A transfer was made with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor;
- Without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or obligation;
- The debtor was engaged or was about to engage in a business or a transaction for which the remaining assets of the debtor were unreasonably small in relation to the business or transaction;
- Debtor intended to incur, or believed, or reasonably should have believed, that he would incur debt beyond his ability to pay as they became due; and
- There is heightened scrutiny if the transfer or obligation was to an insider as defined by statute.
NRS 112.180; NRS 112.210; NRS 112.190; In re: FSG-R, LLC, 2012 WL 753353; In re 155 East Tropicana, LLC, 2012 WL 668579; Herup v. First Boston Financial, LLC, 123 Nev. 27, 162 P.3d 870, 873 (2007); Montana Nat’l. Bank v. Michels, 631 P.2d 1260 (Nev. 1981); Crescent v. White, 92 Nev. 661, 556 P.2d 1265 (1976); Matusik v. Large, 85 Nev. 202, 462 P.2d 457 (1969); 32 Am. Jur. 2d Fraudulent Conveyances § 10, at 701.
See elements for other claims at the Nevada Law Library
